mirror of
https://github.com/gmemstr/blog.gabrielsimmer.com.git
synced 2024-09-19 19:51:10 +01:00
58 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
title: Things Twitter Should Do Better
|
||
|
date: 2016-01-14
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Just some notes...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Twitter is going downhill (in my opinion). Since Jack
|
||
|
Dorsey became CEO (again), there have been some... *interesting*
|
||
|
additions. The number one, most useless thing they wasted their time on
|
||
|
is **Twitter Moments**. Moments is basically a summary of media the
|
||
|
people who follow have tweeted. I'd like to see some stats on how many
|
||
|
people use it, and how many of those people clicked it either by
|
||
|
accident or out of idle curiosity. I don't think it's something Twitter
|
||
|
should have spent time developing -- perhaps their time would have been
|
||
|
better spent improving their existing things, like making the Twitter
|
||
|
mobile app more consistent or streamlining Twitter for Web -- or hell,
|
||
|
even making TweetDeck nicer to use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The official Twitter app for Android (not sure about iOS) is a mess. The
|
||
|
most prominent issue I have is the fact that the top navigation bar will
|
||
|
change what icons it has where, either when I switch between accounts or
|
||
|
just restart the app. Their bottom nav is terrible too -- it will cycle
|
||
|
between a clunky floating action button, a bar with a faux-text input
|
||
|
and camera icon, and a three-section bar consisting of a new tweet,
|
||
|
camera, and gallery icons. What is this? Why on Earth do we need three
|
||
|
different nav styles -- that it *cycles between?!* I want to know both
|
||
|
how and why this decision was made, if it can count as a decision.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I think the worst part of this whole Twitter app debacle is that they
|
||
|
have people at Twitter who know how to do Twitter apps. The creator of
|
||
|
[Falcon Pro](http://getfalcon.pro/)
|
||
|
works at Twitter, and I consider his app an absolutely amazing Twitter
|
||
|
experience. So how why is the experience so terrible? And why are they
|
||
|
focusing on new things like an edit button (rumored), 10,000 character
|
||
|
tweets (again, rumored), and **bloody Twitter Moments**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### So, Mr. Jack Dorsey, how could you make Twitter decent again?
|
||
|
|
||
|
First, take a step back. Remember what you envisioned Twitter being. No,
|
||
|
not a text-only messaging system, that's a terrible idea, and remember
|
||
|
how much debt Twitter was in after that. No, rather, take a step back
|
||
|
and simplify. Cut out the 'features' you think are fantastic. Make it a
|
||
|
140-character microblogging platform. Cut out anything that you can see
|
||
|
any reason to have. Open up your API more and let devs work on what they
|
||
|
want to. Why? Because people want and have freedom of choice. If they
|
||
|
don't want to use the official Twitter app, fine. Let them use an
|
||
|
unofficial one, an unofficial one that has actual access to something
|
||
|
resembling an API, not extremely basic functions. And fix your own
|
||
|
official apps, so people are actually tempted to use them. Keep the
|
||
|
140-character limit, because it's a gimmick that worked. Return Likes to
|
||
|
Favorites, because you're not Facebook, as much as you want to work
|
||
|
there. Maybe fix up Tweetdeck so it's a little nicer to use, modernize
|
||
|
the UI and make it flow. Promote the Falcon Pro author to a position
|
||
|
where he can make some UI/UX suggestions and actually get heard.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And above all, *please don't kill the blue bird.*
|